Thursday, March 26, 2009

Schindler's List


Schindler's List is the story of the Holocaust told through the events of one businessman and his use of cheap labor be the persecuted Jews. This man, Oskar Schindler (pictured left) ran, at first, a factory that produced pots and pans and other metal works. As the war went on he saw a greater opportunity to make money through the production of war-time goods such as artillery shells. On multiple occasions he looses his workers as they get sent to new concentration camps and even the death camp Auschwitz. Oskar does not simply replace his workers when they are "misplaced" but instead pays a lot of money to get them back into his factories. Through the story he encounters many Nazi officials, as he is a member of the Nazi party himself. He is rude but honest to these people giving the Jewish people a voice, something that was rare at this time. In the end Schindler must go on the run because the war had ended and anyone that persecuted the Jews, as he did by making them work without pay, was to be hunted down and punished. The workers of his factory throw him a ceremony to honor the good work he had done for their people. As he is about to leave all that he wishes as that he could have saved more people.
To paraphrase Oskar Schindler in the movie, power is the ability to pardon someone when they have every justification to be punished. Adolf Hitler, someone associated strongly with the word power, fails in both these aspects. Adolf Hitler gave no forgiveness and held nothing back. On top of this the group of people he was targeting had done nothing wrong. Another kind of power, though, is to have the capacity to control many people. This kind of power can be given to you but others need to have a talent in appealing to masses to take control. Either way this kind of power comes with great responsibility. As one becomes the voice of a group of people or an entire nation they must keep everybody's motives in mind. It becomes easy to target a minority because their say in the world will be smaller due to simple populous proportions. This does not mean, though, that their opinions do not matter or they are not a part of the country or group you are in. Hitler attempted to take minorities out of his World, and misused his powers immensely, on the other hand, Oskar Schindler, who had many leadership qualities, managed the people around him effectively and keeping morals in mind. Power has a positive connotation but in reality both of these individuals had it. It is instead motives and good will that set them apart.
This movie was effective in teaching a history and telling an individual story. By focusing on the life on Oskar Schindler, somebody that went from being a questionable protagonist to the hero of the story. His story revolved around the events of the holocaust so many facts about the event were entwined in the story. The reason this movie is effective is not because of facts and gruesome images, it is instead because the personal tale of one extrodiary case where good prevailed in a time of hatred really shows what this era was like. At first Schindler punished and used the Jews as anyone in his party would have, he then went through a transformation. As he was writing list to which workers he wanted to employ in his factory he made a realization. He name on the list, which he was paying for by the fortune he was making with his factories, got to survive. He was buying lives. He couldn't stop just rambling names, pages and pages. He is almost driven mad by the idea of choosing. In the end he does not want any of his material belongings, as they could just have been more lives he could have saved. The fact he was willing to stand up to evil and put his wealth and success behind him and strictly work on saving people that could not save themselves makes him a hero. This story of a changing character makes the movie effective because it is not just this sickening, bloody, statistic-filled film it is an account of a significant story that does not neglect or exaggerate the horrors of the Holocaust.

Monday, February 23, 2009

sources

http://homerepair.about.com/od/termsor/g/Pigment.htm
pigment paint info

http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/460189/pigment
encyclopedia entry on paint

http://www.alifetimeofcolor.com/study/g_tempera.html
art definition

http://www.newton.dep.anl.gov/askasci/chem99/chem99050.htm
chemistry of paint

Tuesday, September 2, 2008

What is no child left behind?

A remained question I had even after reading the two previous documents was, what some or all of the specific mandates that no child left behind requires. Before now I saw a few excerpts from the actual NCLB act and the language used was very specific for its target audience, legislation who have become accustom to this way of presenting information. I, however, a high school student had difficulty powering through one section of the document that the previous article cited. Luckily, on NCLB's website they clearly show what NCLB asks for.
  • NCLB ensures access for all children to have the resources and education necessary to excel in school and for the rest of their lives.

Friday, August 29, 2008

How Does No Child Left Behind Effect Charter Schools?

Looking into the document No Child Left Behind and Charter Schools I learned how a charter school is effects by the NCLB act. I attend a charter school and have always felt exempt from the controversies of public school. The battle of authorizing and reauthorizing NCLB is one of these dilemmas. The schism between legislators for and against NCLB grows as alternative solutions are discussed. There is much discussion of the nuts and bolts of this 6 year old act and this is where the dissagreements arise from. Much like analysing and finding loopholes in the constitution the fedral goverment spends plenty of time looking into everything this document includes. As for charter schools there is an obvious inclusion of them into NCLB, after all, a charter school is still a public school and belongs to a school discrict. As a student I would gain the benefits and feel the retributions of NCLB just as any other student would, for the most part, according to this document. This exemption is how charter schools' charters have precident over this goverment act, therefore the school's goals may differ from those of NCLB. Title I is a part of NCLB that expresses the accountabilitity of schools to provide a proper education. This accountability can be expressed in standardized test scores and AYP requirements. I was a little confused about all this legislative jargon but it is obvious that the answers to my questions are burried somewhere the facts and the specific regulations of NCLB.

Looking to research more I am curious to:
1) What are the specific requirements of NCLB, in terms I can understand?
2) What does our goverment think of NCBL at this time and are there any alternatives out there?

No Child Left Behind Initial Reseach Blog

After reading and analyzing Pros & Cons of the No Child Left Behind Act (url: http://usliberals.about.com/od/education/i/NCLBProsCons.htm) I gained a better understanding on the effects of reauthorizing the act. No Child Left Behind (NCLB) mandates a set number of programs designed to help school districts. I feel this could be useful to school in need of a format that allows its students to excel. Through a carefully designed plan this act could make our nations education system benefit through uniformity and authority. In some ways a government standardized system in place in our schools may be disheartening, but I feel in the long run it would eliminate problems in districts failing to meet the nation standards already in place. Although I attend a charter school and the NCLB funding would be directed towards other educational programs and systems, I can still relate to the effects this act has on students. By standardizing the education in a district more tests need to be taken and those tests can be biased and overwhelming. I feel that before reinstating the act there would need to be strides taken to reform the process in which students are to be assessed.

This was one article and did not answer every question I had. As I continue my research is still want to know:
1) Where is the NCLB act now, is it not in place?
2) If not what are the goals of the legislators attempting to reauthorize the act?
3) As a charter school still involved in a school district would there be any effects of the NCLB act on me?